When we
are buying a stock, do we consider the stock's capitalization as a factor in our
buy or no buy decision? If we do, do we have a basis why we prefer one cap over
another? Is there a relationship between a stock's capitalization and its performance?
Let's find out.
From 2000 to 2004, ACE'S have picked micro-, small-, mid- and
large-cap stocks. Starting in 2005, ACE'S have confined its picks
to small-, mid- and large cap stocks. We have often heard or read the
conventional wisdom that "small-caps have higher gains but are riskier"; whereas
"large caps have lower gains but are less risky". How does the latter
conventional wisdom stack up against ACE'S historical figures?
Let's check it out.
We tabulated the 12-month gain (loss) of our micro-, small-, mid- and large cap
stocks from 2000-2006, and compared those gains (losses) versus the
corresponding S&P 500 gains (losses). SEE: Table A below.
RECAP
1. Capitalization do matter for ACE'S stocks. Table A and the
ranking below shows that
ACE'S mid-caps are the dominant cap with a 12-mo. average gain of
70.76% (vs. the S&P's 3.17% gain). The mid-caps gain of 70.76% is
practically double the corresponding gains of micro-, small- and large-cap
stocks (of about 34.14%). Also, the performance of ACE'S mid-caps from
year-to-year is high and consistent.
| Rank | Capitalization |
(2000-2006) 12-Month Pick Gain (Loss) |
(2000-2006) 12-Month S&P 500 Gain (Loss) |
| 1 | Mid | 70.76% | 3.17% |
| 2 | Micro | 37.51% | 0.61% |
| 3 | Small | 32.82% | (2.62%) |
| 4 | Large | 32.10% | (2.64%) |
| 5 | (Unknown) | 22.68% | (4.34%) |
2.
There is a
degree of relationship between ACE'S stocks' capitalization
and their performances: Mid-caps' performance is tops (at 70.76% gain) and far
superior to the performances of Micro-. Small- and Large-caps.
ACE'S Micro-caps came in second place with (12-mo.) gain of 37.51%
(vs. the S&P's 0.61% gain); and small- and large-caps are in a virtual tie for third
place with (12-mo.) gain of about 32.46% (vs. the S&P's gain of about -2.63%).
3. Table 1 shows -- in reference to the earlier described "conventional wisdom"
-- that for ACE'S picks, small-caps do not necessarily have higher
gains and that large-caps do not necessarily have lower gains. In actuality, for
ACE'S picks, small- and large-caps had essentially the same gains;
and the top gainer is neither of the latter two.
4. On the matter of
"a basis for preferring
one cap over another":
The above findings could serve as the investor's basis in preferring one (of
ACE'S) cap over another (but not totally excluding -- for a
portfolio's cap
diversification purposes -- other caps).
|
TABLE A 12-MONTH PERFORMANCE ~ ACE'S PICKS BY STOCK CAPITALIZATION |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Stock Cap. | Count | %% of Total Count |
Pick Gain (Loss) |
S&P 500 Gain (Loss) |
| 2000 | Micro- | 1 | 17.69% | 97.16% | (16.75%) |
| Small- | 3 | 23.08% | 30.92% | (17.28%) | |
| Mid- | 7 | 53.85% | 32.07% | (18.00%) | |
| Large- | 2 | 15.38% | (21.43%) | (14.86%) | |
| TOTAL | 13 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 34.68% | (16.72%) | |
| 2001 | Unknown | 2 | 6.25% | 48.84% | (11.72%) |
| Micro- | 7 | 21.88% | 22.45% | (16.02%) | |
| Small- | 16 | 50.00% | 56.70% | (18.41%) | |
| Mid- | 5 | 15.63% | 90.87% | (11.84%) | |
| Large- | 2 | 6.25% | (0.90%) | (11.64%) | |
| TOTAL | 32 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 42.28% | (13.93%) | |
| 2002 | Micro- | 5 | 16.67% | (5.45%) | 2.03% |
| Small- | 17 | 56.67% | 21.91% | (14.00%) | |
| Mid- | 5 | 16.67% | 52.80% | 2.71% | |
| Large- | 3 | 10.00% | 14.39% | (22.63%) | |
| TOTAL | 30 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 20.90% | (7.97%) | |
| 2003 | Unknown | 1 | 5.00% | (29.65%) | 10.41% |
| Micro- | 4 | 20.00% | 70.84% | 21.40% | |
| Small- | 8 | 40.00% | 57.70% | 19.20% | |
| Mid- | 5 | 25.00% | 52.35% | 14.31%) | |
| Large- | 2 | 10.00% | 106.72% | 11.20% | |
| TOTAL | 20 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 51.59% | 15.30% | |
| 2004 | Micro- | 2 | 9.09% | 58.76% | 6.64% |
| Small- | 5 | 22.73% | 38.18% | 7.23% | |
| Mid- | 10 | 45.45% | 63.92% | 6.96% | |
| Large- | 5 | 22.73% | 38.23% | 5.78% | |
| TOTAL | 22 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 49.77% | 6.65% | |
| 2005 | Micro- | 0 | - | - | - |
| Small- | 13 | 59.09% | 40.42% | 12.43% | |
| Mid- | 8 | 36.36% | 148.76% | 8.04% | |
| Large- | 1 | 4.55% | 48.59% | 7.59% | |
| TOTAL | 22 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 79.25% | 9.35% | |
| 2006 | Micro- | 0 | - | - | - |
| Small- | 13 | 59.09% | (2.16%) | 12.09% | |
| Mid- | 8 | 36.36% | 28.39% | 12.14% | |
| Large- | 1 | 4.55% | 14.34% | 4.06% | |
| TOTAL | 22 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| AVERAGES | - | - | 13.52% | 9.43% | |
| 2000 to 2006 | Unknown | 3 | 1.84% | 22.68% | (4.34%) |
| Micro- | 23 | 14.11% | 37.51% | (16.02% | |
| Small- | 6 | 50.00% | 56.70% | 0.61% | |
| Mid- | 53 | 32.52% | 70.76% | 3.17% | |
| Large- | 17 | 10.43% | 32.10% | (2.64%) | |
| GRAND TOTAL | 163 | 100.00% | - | - | |
| GRAND AVERAGES | - | - | 39.17% | (1.16%) | |
A big challenge in profitable stock investing is timing your buys (i.e., knowing at what price it is advantageous to buy a stock). Simply identifying and knowing that a stock is good and buying the stock outright -- without consideration of the stock's "relative price level" -- could subject the investor to higher degrees of downward price movement. It is a most difficult (if not an impossible) task to perfectly time a stock buy. At best, we can devise a method (a set of criteria) to gauge or anticipate an advantageous buy point; apply that method systematically; and hope that the method works at high enough success rate. A method that ACE'S have adopted to tackle this timing problem is the stock's "exponential moving average" ("EMA" for short).
On February 16, 2007, ACE'S started using a stock's EMA in the pick's table of core strengths. ACE'S thinking was that the EMA provides the investor with an objective indication of the market's current "base" valuation of a particular stock. Knowing the stock's (market) base price then, the investor has an indicator on how much a stock's actual price is over or under a particular referential EMA (e.g., its EMA-13, the 13-day exponential moving average or its EMA-50, the 50-day exponential moving average ), and could thus use the particular EMA as the basis for setting the buy point for a particular stock. (SEE: How the EMAs are put to actual use by ACE'S).
How has ACE'S use of EMA's done so far? Does it matter whether an investor buys
below or above a stock's EMA price?
As of October 31, 2007 (and since the February 2007 EMA inception), there were
11 picks whose (pick date) closing prices were below their then respective
EMA-13s; and there were 21 picks whose closing prices were above their then
respective EMA-13s. If we assume, strictly for this study, that we could (and do indeed) buy the subject
ACE'S stocks at their then pick date closing prices, we could thus compare the
performance of the two groups of stocks' (i.e., the ones bought below and the
ones bought above their then respective EMA-13s). How the stocks have performed
are shown in Tables A & B below.
FINDINGS:
Table A shows ACE'S picks that were bought at their then closing prices (which
were below their then EMA-13 prices). These group of stocks have an average gain
of 19.52% for the averaged 4.09 month invested period (or, roughly, a gain of
4.77% per month). Table B shows ACE'S picks that were bought at their then
closing prices (which were above their then EMA-13 prices). These group of
stocks have an average gain of 8.35% for the averaged 4.29 month invested period
(or, roughly, a gain of 1.95% per month).
The tabulations thus suggests that ACE'S picks bought at prices that were lower
than their corresponding EMA-13 prices, roughly, have 2.82% point gain/month
(i.e., 4.77%/mo. - 1.95%/mo.) better than ACE'S picks bought at prices that were
higher than their corresponding EMA-13 prices. The 2.82% point gain/month
advantage, for a 12-month period, would be equivalent to 33.84% point gain advantage.
Based on the above findings, there is a relative advantage when an investor buys below a
stock's EMA price (as opposed to buying above a stock's EMA price).
A. PERFORMANCE - ACE'S STOCKS W/ PICK PRICES BELOW THEIR EMA-13
PRICES
|
TABLE A PERFORMANCE ~ ACE'S STOCKS W/ PICK PRICES BELOW THEIR EMA-13 PRICES |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stock Name, (Business sector) |
SYM | Pick Dt |
Pick Dt Prce |
EMA-13 Price | Eval. Dt | Cum. Div. |
Eval. Dt Price |
Months |
% Gain (Loss) |
| Spartan Motors Inc. (NASD\Auto & Truck Mnufacturers) | SPAR | 03/05/07 |
$20.08 $13.35* |
$21.40 | 10/05/07 | -- | $17.63 | 07 | 32.06% |
|
NBTY Inc (NYSE\Biotechnology & Drugs) |
NTY | 03/09/07 | $47.92 | $48.25 | 10/09/07 | -- | $39.78 | 07 | (16.99%) |
| Siliconware Precision Industries (NASD\Semiconductors) | SPIL | 04/20/07 |
$9.86 $9.38* |
$10.21 | 10/20/07 | -- | $11.59 | 06 | 23.56% |
| Companhia Vale do Rio (NYSE\Metal Mining) | RIO | 05/25/07 |
$43.38 $21.59* |
$43.70 | 10/25/07 | -- | $33.49 | 05 | 55.12% |
|
Terex Corp. (NYSE \ Miscellaneous Capital Goods) |
TEX | 06/06/07 | $82.17 | $82.94 | 10/08/07 | -- | $87.76 | 04 | 6.08% |
|
CAE Inc (NYSE\Electronic Instruments & Controls) |
CGT | 06/29/07 | $13.34 | $13.36 | 10/29/07 | -- | $13.29 | 04 | (0.30%) |
| Novo Nordisk A/S ADR (NYSE\Biotechnology & Drugs) | NVO | 09/20/07 | $109.93 | $109.94 | 10/20/07 | -- | $115.64 | 03 | 5.19% |
| Vimpel Communications (NASD\Semiconductors) | VIP | 07/27/07 |
$101.29 $20.26* |
$107.73 | 10/27/07 | -- | $3299 | 03 | 62.83% |
| CommScope Inc. (NYSE\Communication Equipment) | CTV | 08/03/07 | $53.23 | $57.29 | 10/03/07 | -- | $51.10 | 02 | (3.83%) |
| Johnson Controls Inc. (NYSE\Business Services) | JCI | 08/10/07 |
$114.95 $38.20* |
$115.58 | 10/10/07 | -- | $40.19 | 02 | 5.20% |
| FMC Technologies Inc. (NYSE\Oil Well Services & Equipment) | FTI | 08/17/07 |
$86.94 $43.32* |
$89.06 | 10/17/07 | -- | $63.00 | 02 | 55.09% |
| A V E R A G E S | 4.09 | 19.52% (or 4.77%/mo.) | |||||||
Note: * - indicates that the original pick price was adjusted (to
reflect splits and/or dividends).
The prices above shown where extracted
from Yahoo's Finance\Historical Price tables.
^Top page
B.
PERFORMANCE - ACE'S STOCKS W/ PICK PRICES ABOVE THEIR EMA-13 PRICES
|
TABLE A PERFORMANCE ~ ACE'S STOCKS W/ PICK PRICES ABOVE THEIR EMA-13 PRICES |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stock Name, (Business sector) |
SYM | Pick Dt |
Pick Dt Prce |
EMA-13 Price | Eval. Dt | Cum. Div. |
Eval. Dt Price |
Months |
% Gain (Loss) |
|
Markwest Hydrocarbons, Inc.
(AMEX\Oil & Gas Operations)
|
MWP | 02/16/07 |
$56.56 $55.85* |
$52.42 | 10/16/07 | -- | $58.91 | 08 | 5.48% |
| Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (NASD\Investment Services) | BONT | 03/16/07 |
$55.15 $54.90* |
$51.77 | 10/16/07 | -- | $20.89 | 07 | (61.95%) |
|
Eastern Co. (AMEX\Auto & Truck Parts) |
EML | 03/26/07 |
$27.72 $27.51* |
$26.52 | 10/26/07 | -- | $19.80 | 07 | (28.03%) |
|
Volvo ADR (NASD\Auto & Truck Manufacturers) |
VOLV | 04/01/07 |
$84.07 $15.51* |
$82.60 | 10/01/07 | -- | $17.74 | 06 | 14.38% |
| Brush Engineered Materials, Inc. (NYSE \ Industrial Metals & Minerals) | BW | 04/06/07 | $51.78 | $49.36 | 10/06/07 | -- | $52.32 | 06 | 1.04% |
| Millicom International Cellular Co. (NASD\Communication Services) | MICC | 04/13//07 | $83.73 | $81.35 | 10/13/07 | -- | $92.13 | 06 | 10.03% |
|
Southern Copper Corp. (NYSE\Mining) |
PCU | 04/27/07 |
$82.27 $79.62* |
$80.38 | 10/27/07 | -- | $136.57 | 06 | 71.53% |
| Partner Communication Co. (NASD\Communication Services) | PTNR | 05/07/07 |
$16.45 $16.08* |
$16.33 | 10/07/07 | -- | $17.17 | 05 | 6.78% |
| Precision Castparts Corp. (NYSE\Construction Supplies & Fixtures) | PCP | 05/11/07 |
$110.91 $110.86* |
$107.89 | 10/11/07 | -- | $145.45 | 05 | 31.20% |
| Constellation Energy Group (NYSE\Electric Utilities) | CEG | 05/18/07 |
$94.97 $94.01* |
$93.46 | 10/1807 | -- | $89.79 | 05 | (4.49%) |
| LAN Chile ADS (NYSE\Airlines) | LFL | 06/01/07 |
$81.27 $15.96* |
$79.91 | 10/01/07 | -- | $16.04 | 04 | 0.50% |
|
Potash Corp. Saskatchewan
(NYSE\Non-metallic Mining) |
POT | 06/15/07 |
$77.62 $77.46* |
$73.49 | 10/15/07 | -- | $109.32 | 04 | 6/15/07t>41.13% |
|
Deckers Outdoors Inc. (NASD\Footwear) |
DECK | 06/22/07 | $93.91 | $93.00 | 10/22/07 | -- | $118.47 | 04 | 26.14% |
| Nokia Corp. (NYSE\Communication Equipment) | NOK | 07/06/07 | $28.92 | $28.35 | 10/06/07 | -- | $36.53 | 03 | 26.31% |
| Loews Corp. (NYSE\Insurance)/font> | LTR | 07/13/07 |
$51.86 $51.79* |
$51.64 | 10/13/07 | -- | $50.12 | 03 | (3.22%) |
| Trimble Navigation Ltd. (NASD\Scientific & Technical Instruments) | TRMB | 08/24/07 | $36.99 | $36.29 | 10/24/07 | -- | $42.29 | 02 | 14.33% |
|
Cummins Inc. (NYSE\Misc. Capital Goods) |
CMI | 08/31/07 | $118.42 | $113.34 | 10/31/07 | -- | $119.96 | 02 | 1.30% |
|
Gamestop Corp. (NYSE \ Retail - Technology) |
GME | 09/07/07 | |||||||